Departing lawyers who copied firm’s databases may be liable for unfair business practices, top state court says

Legislation Firms

Graphic from

Departing attorneys who downloaded a “treasure trove” of proprietary elements from their Boston legislation organization may perhaps be liable for unfair or misleading business enterprise procedures, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court has ruled.

The court ruled for the Governo Regulation Firm in its lawsuit in opposition to a group of nonequity partners who at 1st produced an offer you to obtain Governo and then started observe at their new legislation a working day immediately after their supply was rejected. The legal professionals experienced by now incorporated the new regulation company, CMBG3, and they made use of the downloaded resources in their apply, according to the court’s April 9 opinion.

Regulation360 and the Boston Company Journal have coverage, even though Holland & Knight revealed an inform on the situation.

According to Holland & Knight, the conclusion appears to be the very first occasion in which a courtroom deemed this style of carry out to generate feasible liability underneath a state’s deceptive methods laws.

“Taking supplies designed by or for the agency at the firm’s expense may make pitfalls to the legal professional and the attorney’s new agency under purchaser protection regulations,” the notify mentioned.

Governo represented insurance firms in asbestos litigation. The legal professionals started secretly downloading the investigate library, databases and administrative data files on to significant-ability thumb drives in October 2016. It cost more than $100,000 to build the library and the exact same total to establish the databases, in accordance to the view.

The downloaded exploration library consisted of additional than 100,000 documents appropriate to asbestos litigation, which includes witness interviews, skilled experiences and investigative stories. The searchable databases incorporated scientific details. The administrative files included advertising materials and client lists.

In June 2019, jurors awarded the Governo Legislation Firm $900,000 on claims of conversion, conspiracy and breach of the duty of loyalty. But jurors did not discover legal responsibility on a claim of unfair or misleading trade practices.

The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Courtroom said Governo is entitled to a new trial on the trade procedures assert due to the fact of faulty jury recommendations by the demo judge. The choose wrongly said jurors could not take into account copying of paperwork even though they were being however used at Governo.

“Where an worker misappropriates his or her employer’s proprietary supplies for the duration of the system of employment and then utilizes the purloined elements in the marketplace, that conduct is not purely an inner matter instead, it comprises a marketplace transaction that might give rise to a claim” less than the trade methods legislation, the court claimed.

“Had they not been informed to disregard this conversion, the jury could have identified that the defendants’ subsequent use of the converted elements was an unfair or misleading act, rendering the defendants liable.”

The Governo Regulation Firm’s proprietor, David Governo, is now a spouse with the Boston business Smith Duggan Buell & Rufo, according to the Boston Organization Journal. An online see on the Governo Regulation Firm’s web site suggests other Governo lawyers and staff members customers also moved to Smith Duggan.

Yung A. Elizabeth

Next Post

Grocery-anchored shopping center owners Kimco, Weingarten to merge

Fri Apr 16 , 2021
Kimco Realty Corp. plans to obtain Weingarten Realty Traders in a $3.87 billion deal that will generate one of the nation’s largest public owner/operators of open up-air, grocery-anchored shopping facilities and mixed-use attributes. Kimco and Weingarten claimed Thursday that their put together countrywide portfolio would consist of 559 open up-air […]